• kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    AI agents will be become invisible, inescapable, follow you across devices

    But what if I don’t want them to?

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I feel like I’m getting the last laugh for being childfree and, how shall we say, no longer young. I’m just hoping to run down the clock before things get too shitty. But they seem to be trying to speedrun this shit.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So… instead of creating a product, proving it’s good, and getting sales that way, they’re using rapist tactics and arguments!? No red flags there!

  • KingKong33@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m sorry, how is it inescapable? If I follows me across devices, I just won’t use those devices. So how’s it going to follow me then?

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You don’t need to use devices. Other people are, so you will be part of it. Any device in your proximity will listen to you, any photos other people take of you will identify you, public cameras or facitities will surveil you, smart energy meters will know what you do in your home…

      That is why the position of “I don’t care, because I don’t use that tech.” or “It is peoples choice.” Is so useless… We need strong regulation… Worldwide.

  • realitista@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    CEO translation: “Please buy our 6g equipment: here’s a spurious justification”. I remember how VR/AR was supposed to be the justification for why we needed 5g speeds.

    • NakedNateRollerSkate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Autonomous vehicles too. I know because I wrote some of the patents ten years ago for Qualcomm and Ericsson on these exact topics. The world felt like a much different place back then.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Cue the pirates of the Caribbean scene/ where captain Barbosa tells you you’re “in one”

      You best start believing dystopian sci-fi stories, you’re in one

  • Sem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I read the whole article and did not find an answer for a very simple question: what are benefits for users? The whole speech is about how we CAN put agents to all the devices, etc. without answering the simple question WHY should we do it. There are a lot of words about how can google and friends use the data for advertising. But nothing about motivation of users to allow it. He is talking about economical reasons but it will work if and only if users will have economical reasons to put agents on their devices. As of today I do not see a lot of usage of autonomous agents outside of the professional work like software development or ms word automation. What are reasons for people to make these agents a part of their life? The whole speech is built on top of the assumption that happens without a word about why should it. Am I missing something?

    • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You’re not missing anything. Execs have bought into AI hype and consider it a given that AI will be transformative, so they’re not bothering to think about use cases or real world applications. After all, the “user” is beneath them; so the user should just be happy and grateful for the opportunity.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This is why people like him hate/fear regulation. Regulating this is the people’s way (in a functioning democracy) to put hard barriers on what these people are permitted to do in order to squeeze out another dime.

    • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Makes sense, they are assimilating everything in their grasp by force and without consent.