Nice to see, how the score comes together.

  • stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just like organicmaps, it’s great for offline hiking trail maps. Search is terrible compared to gmaps though, unfortunately, which is understandable. Good, context-sensitive search is hard, and Google has decades of experience in refining (and ruining) it. But whenever I’m in doubt about mobile data coverage I reach for organicmaps comaps

    • GarbadgeGoober@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was some controversy about Organicmaps and Comaps ended up as fork afterwards.

      So better to use Comaps.

        • sbeak@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          The community believed their voice weren’t being heard by the shareholders, and the lack of a good response by Organic Maps led to a fork of the project being formed. CoMaps was meant to have more transparent governance and take more into account community feedback, and both the name and logo was voted by community members! I also know that iodeOS, a French based private degoogled Android ROM, ships with CoMaps as its default mapping app!

          Additionally, CoMaps has already had a few neat extra features over Organic Maps added, like a nicer UI, which is pretty cool. And I think the (community voted) logo design looks nicer than that of Organic Maps, but that’s just my opinion.

          I much prefer using OpenStreetMap apps like CoMaps since you can download offline versions of the map!