• Melchior@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Officials from the countries want to keep state-level control, and have expressed concerns that banning products from Huawei Technologies and other Chinese suppliers at the EU level risks retaliation from Beijing, the people said, asking not to be identified as the discussions are not public.

    If China retaliates, that basically means the security concerns were warranted. Sure it is not great for Beijing, but also not big business either.

    • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Countries retaliate against protectionist policies all the time. Is it only evidence of espionage when China does it or is the whole world spying on each other?

    • Calavera@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      No it was does not mean that, it can simply mean that if EU makes more difficult for chinese companys to work in EU they will also do the same to EU companies. That’s simply reciprocity

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        You sound like a Chinese chill. It already is quite difficult for non Chinese to operate in China and they are heavily discriminated against. Getting to parity isn’t necessarily a good thing, but not going there for the risk of causing offense is surrendering your sovereignty.

        • Calavera@lemmy.zip
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Except the fact that what you are saying now is completely irrelevant to what was said before

          China retaliating doesn’t mean the security concerns are warranted.

          Not sure why are you trying to move the goal post

          • Gladaed@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            You suggested retaliation through discrimination. They are already doing that. Hence this is not a credible threat.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Last time the EU did this, Ericsson stock fell & they lost billion in Chinese contracts.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Sure it is not great for Beijing, but also not big business either.

      That’s assuming it only stops there; you could make a compelling argument that even with no foul play it’s in China’s best interests to put its foot down before increasing European protectionism starts eating into its geopolitical strategy and/or bottom line.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    the whole, oh no, china might retaliate, is the same attitude as, we can’t tax billionaires cuz they might leave.

  • Brummbaer@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Now do the same with US gear and suddenly there are no options left.

    Normally I would say at least the US are seen as allies, but I don’t think friendly countries are threatening to invade you.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    The more immediate concern is probably to ban American network equipment. Since we know for a fact that has been used by CIA to spy on non American companies.
    There is still no evidence that Huawei spies on Europeans, despite it’s more than a decade since USA made the claim. USA has never been able to show anything supporting their claim, that to me seems like a “No You!” incident. And Huawei is offering full disclosure on their equipment.
    But if we can use Nokia or Siemens or Ericsson instead I’m all for it. But as I understand it they are way behind on the necessary technologies to be competitive. Meaning the entire European mobile infrastructure will be noncompetitive.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Our security is not good if we rely on the security of the network. We have to assume that western gear is hacked anyway. As long as the internet can route around the equipment in case of trouble, everything is ok. It might even be helpful if we have a conflict within the EU or with the US.