The EU should more assertively defend itself against major global competitors, a group of countries led by France has said in a policy paper … just days before a major strategy debate on China inside the European Commission.
As part of efforts to offer Europe’s industry – battered by the pandemic and multiple energy crisis – better means to compete with China’s state-backed firms, the call for a much more robust EU trade policy comes from France, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy and Lithuania.
The rules-based trading system is “being undermined by a variety of actors and the rise of unfair trade practices,” the group agrees.
In response, Europe “should explore the opportunity to develop a broader, cross-sector trade defence tool”, the paper argues. By citing national security concerns linked to, say, China’s chokehold on a given rare earth, the bloc “could implement measures such as additional duties or TRQs, in order to protect European producers”.
TRQs, better known as quotas, have long been a favoured trade instrument in Paris.
On Friday, 29 May, the European Commission’s top brass will hold a debate on the bloc’s long-term strategy for dealing with China. In 2025, the EU’s trade deficit with China hit €360 billion, up a fifth from the year prior.
…
Hey Europe, why don’t your States back your firms? It will be great for workers and consumers. Who’s going to lose out?
What about the USA?
Same story. No need to focus on a specific country, just incentivize purchasing from EU companies and invest in local manufacturing.
I also think the EU should heavily subsidize european IT, that includes open source. Make sure all government services, schools and universities use open source and EU software first - businesses will follow.
Yes, the ‘de-risking’ from US tech has been going on for some time. Regarding trade, however, China is the much bigger issue. The EU has face a rising trade deficit with China due to imported products made under non-transparent decisions in Chinese supply chains and protectionism by China that goes far beyond subsidies.
It’s not either or, the article even states the following:
The rules-based trading system is “being undermined by a variety of actors and the rise of unfair trade practices,” the group agrees.
-What are you doing EU-chan?
“Arms trade bazooka”




