• Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    And if you’re capable of reading just a little bit more than the first headline

    according to a new code of practice from the equalities watchdog.

    That’s not what the legislation says. How are you still unable to comprehend this after i quoted the actual court ruling to you?

    The court literally ruled that there MUST be a practical alternative to those that do not wish to use the bathroom designated for their biological sex.

    That’s not banning people from bathrooms.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The court literally ruled that there MUST be a practical alternative to those that do not wish to use the bathroom designated for their biological sex.

      This is not a solution to the problem. As I stated, and pretty much everyone else here, the problem is that people are barred from the bathroom OF THEIR SPECIFIC GENDER. How dense can you be? I’m blocking you, this is ridiculous and pointless.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The court just ruled the bathrooms are not divided between genders, they’re divided between the sexes. Your gender does not matter. And they also ruled there must be bathrooms for everyone.

        You really are a fascinating creature. The UK just made it law that everyone must have a bathroom they feel comfortable in. And you think that’s a problem.