The court just ruled the bathrooms are not divided between genders, they’re divided between the sexes. Your gender does not matter. And they also ruled there must be bathrooms for everyone.

You really are a fascinating creature. The UK just made it law that everyone must have a bathroom they feel comfortable in. And you think that’s a problem.

They’re not saying the doctors are at fault. They’re just making the statement that doctors are struggling to contain it.

Which is true. And then you can keep reading to dwelve deeper into why they are struggling.

And if you’re capable of reading just a little bit more than the first headline

according to a new code of practice from the equalities watchdog.

That’s not what the legislation says. How are you still unable to comprehend this after i quoted the actual court ruling to you?

The court literally ruled that there MUST be a practical alternative to those that do not wish to use the bathroom designated for their biological sex.

That’s not banning people from bathrooms.

But the long-awaited guidance also says that businesses and service providers have to offer practical alternatives such as gender-neutral toilets for people who do not wish to use services for their biological sex.

Everyone will have a bathroom they can use. Businesses are required to ensure this. So what’s the problem?

We’re not the ones storming hospitals to retrieve contaminated corpses. We’re not the ones burning down treatment centers.

How do you help those that don’t want to be helped? Setting up a quarantine isn’t turning your back. It’s doing what you can with the tools you have to save those you can.

Turning your back would be to do nothing at all, and just let them keep spreading ebola.

“don’t go near your loved ones as they slowly die in terrible pain”

If what they have is contagious then no. That wouldn’t be very difficult at all. I don’t want to slowly die in terrible pain. And i don’t want to spread this slow death in terrible pain to others either. Really not that complicated.

Some people pay $50-60 for the latest FIFA every year, some people pay $100+ for Netflix every year. Some people buy chips and candy for $100+ a year. Some people buy fastfood for $100+ a year.

How about we just accept that each person get to spend their own money on what makes them happy and leave it at that.

It doesn’t give satisfaction as itself.

Not for you maybe. Because you refuse to see anything beyond “oh they just hate themselves, they’re abuse victims”.

Like most games. It’s a journey, there’s a story waiting to be told. All you have to do is ask the questions.

Some people enjoy the journey you take together with your character. And by the end, you realise that it wasn’t just your character that became stronger. It was you that became stronger. And the castle that’s in ruins is that way for a purpose. Something happened to it. And if you want to discover what that something is. You can.

But you seem like the person that can’t comprehend why someone wants to climb a mountain. Why not just take a helicopter to the top?

You know how Neo at the end of the Matrix finally understood how everything works? When he counters every move Smith makes with ease despite getting his ass kicked just moments earlier at the train station.

That’s the feeling we get from soulsgames when we overcome a challenge.

It’s so obvious that so many here didn’t even read the article.

This really isn’t about toilets as much as locker rooms. Where each person must go to the gendered locker room for their biological sex. Unless there is an alternative. Such as a “trans locker room”

The whole toilet part is adressed in that most businesses will just remove the symbol for M/F on single stalls and call it a day. And most have a handicap friendly stall, which already is gender neutral.

This is more of an issue for places like hospital’s that are required to have gendered spaces.

You thinking SWAT sounds cool is on you. Though the marketing does help, tv series, movies, games etc.

In Sweden we call our equivalent “Strike Force” but in swedish of course. And they basically have access to whatever they need to get the job done. That’s why they exist. And personally, i think their name is pretty cool. It’s very direct and you know instantly upon hearing it what it is they do.

I didnt say they were good or bad. I said why they exist in the first place.

If you came to the conclusion that makes them good, well that’s a journey you took all on your own.

They’re not flying the jets anywhere near the limit on airshows. For one it’s just not safe for the public. And secondly no one wants to reveal the actual limits to enemies.

And yes. I think it’s entierly possible. Seeing as she’s taken her jet for a whooping 40 second flight just to get from one side of LA to the other.

Seing one operating in person and seing one on display are two very different things.

But military airshows are not just for ordinary people to be amazed. It’s an opportunity for the manufacturer to market their airplanes.

And while it does burn a lot of fuel. It’s nothing compared to all the private jets flying around the world.

I’m pretty sure Taylor Swifts jet burns more fuel in a year than all airshows combined.

Their argument seems to be that snus is easier to market for young people with flavors and whatnot.

So if that’s their argument, why not ban the artificial flavoring of tobacco rather than the product? Since they dont want to ban the product in its other forms.

Well, for one, EU isnt a country. It’s a Union of countries. So any such deal would have to be negotiated with an individual country.

And secondly, there are very few countries in the EU that would want to assist the US deporting their “illegal aliens” to Europe.

We’ve been dealing with the continued aftermath of US preacense in the middle east. And been quite busy with that for the past 25 years.

First of all. To declare my bias, i am Swedish. I do not use tobacco.

Tl;dr In my opinion. If they want to ban Snus, then they also need to ban cigarettes and vapes. Snus to many Swedes is what Cigarettes are to Germans and French. Imagine the revolt from those two if EU were to ban cigarettes everywhere.

They mention that Snus can be a gateway to cigarettes, but in all of my life, I’ve only seen the exact opposite. People who want to stop smoking, switch to snus. So, it’s the cigarettes which is a gateway to snus.

I truly hate those that just throw discarded “prillor”, used tobacco, on the ground, but that has been reduced a lot since the pouches now often come with a space to discard used ones. And at least i don’t have to breath in someone’s snus. So it doesn’t affect me.

This government will always stand on the side of Swedish snus users

While i don’t like snus or any tobacco at all for that matter. Obviously our trade minister is going to be on the side that benefits Swedens freedom and Swedish trade. That’s kind of literally his job.

If EU decided to ban Cigarettes everywhere for everyone. Well, guess how happy France or Germany would be about that.

You know the saying, Double standards are twice as good.

Then i do regret to inform you that this isn’t news. The US signed similar deals with Honduras and Uganda in 2025.

The US also have similar deals with Ghana, South Sudan and Eswatini

Because the US have a deal with Congo. They can send deported people there, and Congo get compensated for each person.