spectrums_coherence

To be completely frank, that is a very disrespectful thing to say. My students are intelligent and capable, and most importantly they are very respectful of other’s time and effort, both their teacher and their peer by choosing to understand the material instead of cheating. They attended school to improve themselves by understanding and absorbing existing human knowledge, not because they are ignorant.

Yes he ordered a Trump phone in order to expose it.

I am quite surprised that in the school I am teaching in, student have a much more negative attitude towards genAI than professors, especially in the context of education.

30% of the professor feel that genAI can play a role in education, whereas only 11% of the student holds the same view. That seems to reflect quite well in my homework, only a very small minority (10%) uses some extend of genAI in writing open-ended writing homeworks.

If we really need to summarize the web that frequently, then there is something seriously wrong with the web.

plus Rust is a more modern language with better tool chain and language feature than C/C++

The assumption that solving exam is a “useful” skill. Exams are timed, unhelped, approximation of your skill to do “useful” work

Education is supposed to let students eventually do useful work, not immediately do useful work, and useful wprk should be designing and implementing a final project, not exam and quizzes.

My undergrad also have an honor code, this means some professor do explicitly not supervise exams. Most of these professor would sit outside in the hallway for questions.

Some would do crossword puzzle, some would play kriby on 3DS

My college does the same, but depends on the professor. Most would sit in the hallway and just chill.