• 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • Other brands might be smart enough to use the friction breaks a bit more (or a lot more, which would not be that smart).

    Then again, even the original Prius, the very model of quality and reliability, could get rusty brakes if driven exclusively in very flat areas.

    Afaik the newer cars, at least the current model Y, have the blinker stalk again. Even Tesla had to concede that the yoke/joke steering wheel was at the very least not acceptable to too many customers.

    The door handles are terrible, too. At least in the front you get a lever to open the door from the inside in case of a power failure (normal opening is with a button). The rear doors only have a small pull wire under a hidden hatch in the door pockets. Its bad enough that they didn’t integrate the electronic and mechanical opening in the front for some reason, but the rear is just utter madness. Someone should make them issue a recall and fix all the crazy doors.



  • You are right, no mandatory inspections required from Tesla. Saves a lot of money.

    Most TÜV faults were the brakes and the suspension.

    The friction brakes are almost never used so they rot and rust. Tesla could easily fix that with a software update that uses them every now and then while breaking. Not sure why they haven’t already, because the problem has existed forever. You can easily avoid the problem by using the friction breaks every few months. Afair the most reliable way is to break when the car is in „N“.

    Teslas suspensions have never been really good and they had issues with especially poor quality parts a few years ago. Of course a regular inspection would have found them early, but since those don’t exist, TÜV was the first to fault cars left and right. Newer and replacement parts are supposedly of higher quality. If that is true the TÜV statistics should improve for Tesla over the next years. We shall see.