Yeah I love in maga central. It’s the people who are the problem. I can almost always identify the magats just based on their shitty behavior. Not all people are like that around here but the magats make themselves obvious, and they’re unavoidable.
It’s enough to get you in the door in some countries if you’re willing to teach English. But it won’t get you permanent residence without a lot more work.
Also most countries where that’s possible (East Asia) aren’t much of an improvement over the US if you’re running from rampant capitalism and social conservatism.
Dudebro is having a redditor moment. Glad to see it getting called out here.
Yep coffee date first, dinner date second if the coffee date goes well.
There are other fun things you can do on a first date that don’t cost money too.
Yeah part of our performance evaluation at my company now is how much of our code is “made by AI”. I said sure buddy, added a code attribution to Claude so all of my code gets marked as AI generated even though I manually edit Claude’s subpar output all the time.
As long as I initially generate the code with Claude I can manually change whatever I want and it still somehow marks it all as “AI-generated”. It’s a stupid ass metric for so many reasons, especially because of how dumb their metric-generating LLM bot is.
We have ours configured with our coding standards, mcps, and we have a skill library.
It still outputs code full of mistakes. Usually they’re minor mistakes, but not always.
When we use it to fix defects, it usually fixes the problem, but not in a very robust way. It still needs a lot of supervision to output quality code. For example it will often spot fix defects instead of applying the principle of the code fix to other areas that also need it (i.e. we needed to normalize some data but it only did it in one place, because the ticket only mentioned that one place, however that data is used elsewhere as well)
It’s a helpful tool for sure but it’s rare that I don’t need to make corrections