7·
10 hours agoDon’t worry, we’ll blame teachers for this too. Or make them responsible for controlling it in some ridiculous way.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: October 11th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Isaac Asimov’s future of angry men yelling at uncooperative robots is almost here.
XMPP/Jabber protocol has been used by WhatsApp, and then closed off from the rest of the network. Theoretically, it could be inter-operable.
IIRC (from others, never installed it) McDonald’s app is also obnoxious, requiring permissions and refusing to run on custom ROMs and rooted devices. It was once used alongside some common banking apps as a metric of “how close to Google Android is this ROM”.
211·13 days agoEVE Online (applies to MMOs in general I think). I played it a long time ago with a few friends, but that is it. If I could describe it, it’s opposite of interesting. You can sort of play it solo, but it gets boring and/or grindy fast. Unless you buy in-game money for real money. Dying means losing a ship and all implants, all of which cost money (time).
For “full experience”, apparently you gotta join a corp, and participate in space turf wars. Then it could turn into a second job. And I have a job already. And TBH I am not a very social person.
Loved Outer Wilds, but I completely understand why someone would not. There is almost zero direction, and that is not for everyone. Plus the time limit gets in the way sometimes.
Same, most ESG-based ETFs that I have seen just sound like some sort of numbers fudging instead of reasonable effort.
The more specilized green-adjacent and less “generic” ETFs I found are:
- ETHO for very diversified companies (only one holding is over 1%)
- TAN for solar
- FAN for wind
- EVX for trash and recycling (kind of a moot point of making money on pollution though)
- FIW for water tech (supply, filtering, plumbing)
The article says “…had professors assess whether responses might mislead or confuse students.”
Which makes me think that real people came to some conclusion, sometimes biased or wrong, but AI could have produced inconclusive inflated perhaps-maybe-sometimes text (which it would be good at) 96.5% of the time. Response not being harmful doesn’t mean it’s good.