That’s what I thought.

I doubt I am called upon to pivot quite as much as you are, you being such a big noise in the girl guides.

Not answering this one Susan? Busy telling the Amazon driver you are vegan?

But your hearing and comprehension are demonstrably poor, probably because you are malnourished.

They were wrong, like you are.

Still managed to work it in though didn’t you, how many people that interact with you know you are vegan? Up around the 100 percent mark I would guess. Is that why you are vegan, to supplement your impoverished personality in the same way your unnatural diet needs to be supplemented. Be more powerful if your conviction was known only to you and you didn’t use it for girl guide badges.

I phrased my reply that way precisely because you are using emotive human terms incorrectly to illicit a response but you cannot see it. Animals mating without human formalised consent is not rape and culling or predating wild animals or humanely slaughtering livestock is not murder, at least not in the sense you are trying to force. They are human terms and not applicable, also why did it take you so long to tell us you are vegan and have much higher developed sensibilities than the rest of us.

But you cannot answer it can you.

So you are entirely unaware that a large part of organic evolution on this planet has proceeded by species predation. Or are you aware of it but are simply sliding the definition of words to a disgusting degree to make woke points. Let us be clear what you are saying, animal husbandry for meat production is in your mind correctly defined as murder. So a man murdering a child is equivalent in your view to a man eating a steak, you are so willing to make your self righteous claims that you would allow the severity of child murder to be diminished.

I think the answer lies in how sustainable is the population after modern culls, how humanely is it done and is all the meat eaten by locals.

Yes but the names who were expected to act but did not and later tried to obscure their appeasement will live on in infamy long past our time.

Creating distance and the pretense of opposition when no opposition was made throughout the years it was needed. History has the reality recorded and it will be remembered, examined and taught forever.

All well and good but the wrong people are in charge and those people and the people that follow them are not simply going to step aside. A realistic policy to deal with that is also needed. I suppose it might be dealt with by education.

The tragedy of this is the tragedy of our age and that is if people and companies of people put as much effort into being good as they did into trying to appear good then they would actually be good.

I was writing as to where their focus should be not where it actually is, I dread to think where their focus actually is.

Microsoft don’t build laptops or desktops or phones, they build operating systems, get back to that and build one that offers people a little privacy, ability to configure and freedom from subscription and information begging.

These scientific conclusions were reached from experimental analysis of human subjects held at the expense of the state and supervised by Dr Yosef Mengelberg.

Slow close toilet seats are fairly standard there too.

To be fair I think most of the complaints against China are identical to those being made against AI. We wanted them to have our motivations but we did not see how corrupt those motivations could be until they were reflected back by something that was not us.

If this is being reported as unexpected then there is something desperately wrong with our intelligence, what else are the Chinese doing, building roads and schools near their houses?

Its the Microsoft approach to consent, yes or ask me again in three days.