No question about other countries’ actions was asked, answered or even mentioned in the article. I stand by my assertion that the headline was misleading garbage and should have been called-out in the post.

That’s a funny way to say “…doubt America and the West …”.

I mean, yes, but the point I was making is that most people don’t, and so demand doesn’t adjust to supply or pricing quite as-it-should. I’ve got a few more payments to make on the vehicles I have before EV’s become anything-like a feasible option for me.

I just refuse to budget more for fuel when its more expensive. Gimme an excuse to refuse to leave the house because I don’t have the fuel in my car to drive across town for whatever non-sense and still make it to work until pay-day, I’m going to take it.

That one step is the one they were trying to avoid with the rest of this non-sense. You’re not going to make up the difference for others not doing the same, with this stuff, or telling others to do this stuff.

Still hanging on the point of whether we even bothered to ask if they were interested in net-zero. Doubt they’ve been invited to discuss the topic since the war started either.

I mean, was Iran even invited? … and how are they supposed to achieve it without proper access to world trade in things like, idk, solar panels, wind turbines and … nuclear power generation? Magic?