The last 8 years straight they’ve lost money though…

This is unfortunately way too real. How a supposedly professionally managed fund can loose money when prretty much the entire market is trending upwards is almost impressive.

Charge controllers detect open circuit connections, so it will very likely be in a log when suddenly the controller has an open circuit on the input terminals.

I did not know…what’s sketchy about it?

Archived link: https://archive.is/p6ufq

This isn’t a case of “gaming the system” though. “Gaming the system” implies working within the boundaries of it, but in unforeseen (but legal, or at worst slightly questionable) ways, to min/max your output. This dude just committed plain fraud.

Probably, shitty people will act shitty regardless

40…2…ob…viously…

There’s nothing low and slow about cooking something under the main thrusters of a rocket capable of escaping earth’s gravity…

Of course, but inertia in peoples routines and daily life is also immense. They have definitely made some extensive cost/benefit and risk analysis on this scenario.

2B/day is temporary one-off cost…higher salary is continuous recurring expense.

But this is the same as just having a split electrical circuit to a brake-by-wire solution. It’s only a pseudo-redundant system because you still rely on a single type of mechanical connection to brakes.

Right now there’s also not any failsafes for the break lines failing