• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2025

help-circle
  • You forgot to call me a Russian bot.

    Rejecting that she’s a sellout because the example I’m giving you is one you don’t really care about is going to do you a deservice. You’re simply plugging your head and in the sand and refusing to humor the notion, and she will let you down too in due time.

    Certainly a “lesser evil”, a liberal Zionist nonetheless. Can you call someone leftist if they support modern day Nazis for the benefit of the empire?


  • AOC rides the progressive image by talking positively about Palestine, but she consistently backs the liberal Zionist status quo. She propagates Israel “has a right to exist”, that criticizing Zionists is antisemitic, that resisting genocide is terrorism, that calling for freedom in Palestine is genocidal, etc.

    They speak up about Palestinians being slaughtered, but they only frame it as Israel going too far in their legitimate response to being attacked. Like all Zionists, she pretends history started on October 7, She never addresses Palestinian’s right to self defense or resistance to 78 years of ethnic cleansing and colonization, she never condemns the root of the problem, just some individual headlines that will be forgotten.

    She’s a neo liberal just like the lot of them, she’s slightly more “progressive” but she works hard to stop the wheel from turning too far left.











  • creation of a Jewish state in the middle of a muslim area.

    That is not the issue with Israel. Jews lived peacefully among Muslims and Christians in Palestine, the problems started when they started immigrating from Europe to displace indigenous Palestinians on the bases of religious superiority and exclusivity.

    The problem with Israel is not that they wanted to create a Jewish only state (that’s a different issue), it’s that they wanted to colonize and ethnically cleanse Palestine to do it.



  • There is a difference between the claim that the workers aren’t pro capitalism when they make a good payout, alleging that I’m referring to the workers as capitalists, and me allegedly crediting capitalism itself.

    What are you saying?

    Workers wouldn’t be grateful for getting a “good” payout if they had the option to control the means of production and had the whole pot. They are grateful to have it within the confines of capitalism, if you’re saying they’re grateful for capitalism then you are crediting capitalism.

    Yes, it is obvious that there is a group of people here deeply entrenched in the anglo-centristic world view of a 14 y/o kid who cannot fathom the concept of the average South Koran having a different view of capitalism than them, in light of South Korans having North Korea right across the border.

    It is obvious that you think Koreans aren’t capable of thinking past surface level. Me see worst of North Korea, me grateful for capitalism. Good God.




  • The core problem with the Working Families Party is not that it is “too left" as its mainstream apponents like to paint it, it is that it often uses left energy to discipline people back into the Democratic Party, then calls the cleanup “movement-building.” That can win some seats, but it can also teach leftists to accept candidates who later betray the movement.

    WFP treated John Fetterman as a major 2022 battleground project. In its own 2022 memo, WFP called Pennsylvania “the best opportunity for a Democratic Senate pickup” and said it had built one of its largest voter-contact programs in the state for Fetterman against Dr. Oz.

    But Fetterman’s later record exposed the danger of endorsing “vibes” over political discipline. Once in office, he moved sharply away from the left, especially on Palestine. The New Yorker described him as once being “a beacon for progressives” who then moved beyond even many centrist Democrats in his “unconditional support” for Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

    Then WFP turned around and announced a future primary effort against him. In 2025, Pennsylvania WFP said Fetterman had “sold out working Pennsylvanians” and accused him of being the deciding vote for a Republican budget bill that would strip health care from millions, including more than 400,000 Pennsylvanians.

    That is the problem: WFP helped manufacture Fetterman’s progressive legitimacy, then asked the movement to spend years undoing the consequences. For left movements, this is exhausting. It turns organizing into a cycle of laundering candidates, being betrayed, then fundraising off the betrayal.

    WFP endorsed Platner in March 2026 for the Maine Senate Democratic nomination, calling him a champion for working people who would fight billionaires, lobbyists, and corporate interests.

    But Platner came with serious baggage. There’s his Nazi tattoo that he got to commemorate the great time he had murdering brown people, there’s the fact that he constantly reminisces about his time in the army and how much he enjoyed his war crimes, so much so that he decided a promotion that put him away from the action was not worth it and joined blackwater to do more war crimes instead. And his old online comments include dismissive remarks about military sexual assault, Black patrons, police officers, rural Americans, and anti-LGBTQ jokes. He’s an unapologetic racist war criminal, and is being pushed as a progressive anti-imperialist.

    The left should absolutely believe in transformation, accountability, and people becoming better. But electoral organizations often convert that principle into something thinner: “ignore the contradictions because he has the right class aesthetic.” That is dangerous. A left movement cannot build durable solidarity if it asks women, Black people, queer people, Jews, or antifascists to subordinate their concerns to a candidate’s “working-class” branding.

    Platner may be better than establishment Democrats on economic policy. But WFP’s endorsement illustrates a recurring weakness: the party often treats populist anti-billionaire language as enough, even when the candidate’s record raises questions about political judgment, accountability, and who gets asked to absorb harm for the sake of “the bigger fight.”

    In 2014, WFP endorsed Cuomo after he promised progressive concessions, even though Zephyr Teachout represented a clearer anti-Cuomo left challenge.

    WFP endorsed Elizabeth Warren over Bernie Sanders, after having backed Sanders in 2016, which intensified divisions on the left.

    In 2021, WFP ranked Scott Stringer first, then rescinded the endorsement after sexual misconduct allegations, then shifted to Maya Wiley and Dianne Morales. The result was a fractured left and Eric Adams as NY mayor.

    That’s what they do.




  • Same thing happened a couple years ago when swatch partnered with Omega to release a quartz “MoonSwatch”, designed to look like a Speedmaster Moonwatch.

    Lines were insane, it was sold out everywhere and eBay was flooded with them at insane prices.

    There were some people that wanted a $300 “Omega”, a handful of actual Omega fans/owners who understood the novelty of it and actually wanted it, but the majority of sales went to scalpers and people who don’t know anything about watches that thought they were buying an investment.

    It’s not a limited production, and you can now find it in pretty much all swatch boutiques just sitting and begging to be bought.

    Mostly scalpers and FOMO buyers, that’s who buy it at launch.