Archived version

A paper signed by Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Lithuania landed in Brussels demanding a far tougher trade regime against China — faster emergency tariffs, broader safeguards and new anti-circumvention powers — days before a make-or-break Commission debate on 29 May.

The five want the bloc to confront what they call “systemic and structural industrial overcapacity,” the diplomatic shorthand for Beijing flooding world markets with subsidised goods. The signatories are not fringe voices. They are among the largest economies in the union, and their patience has run out.

The timing is driven by a number that keeps getting worse. China ran a $113 billion trade surplus with the EU in just the first four months of 2026, up from $91 billion a year earlier. Europe’s full-year deficit with China hit nearly €360 billion in 2025. The political question on 29 May is no longer whether to act, but how hard — and whether Europe can hit back without triggering the retaliation Beijing is already promising.

The paper sets out a concrete escalation of Europe’s trade toolkit. It calls for faster emergency tariffs, so Brussels can move in weeks rather than the months its current investigations take. It wants broader safeguards to shield strategic industries, and crucially, new anti-circumvention powers — measures to stop Chinese producers dodging existing tariffs by routing goods through third countries or shifting final assembly offshore.

The fight spans almost every sector Europe still makes things in. Steel, chemicals and electric vehicles are the obvious flashpoints, but the front has widened. Brussels is moving to phase Huawei and ZTE out of telecoms and solar infrastructure over three years, and is weighing a rule forcing EU firms to source critical components from at least three suppliers — a direct attempt to break single-point dependence on Chinese parts.

Then there is the consumer flood. The EU is trying to bring forward a handling fee on the billions of cheap parcels shipped from Shein, Temu and Alibaba — accelerating it by more than two years to protect domestic retailers. Every layer, from heavy industry to the package on your doorstep, is now contested ground.

The era of treating China as simply a large customer is over. What replaces it will be decided, in part, on 29 May — and Europe’s biggest economies have just made clear which way they want it to go.

    • Jaggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not to mention that it was the EU’s urge to outsource manufacturing to China decades ago to earn more profit that caused the whole situation anyway.

      • robomuffin79@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        And therein lies the hypocritical pearl clutching by Europe. They were happy to outsource all those years ago and the bosses of the companies raked in profits whilst their employees were thrown onto the scrap heap. Meanwhile, the Chinese government ensured all the financial payoffs were ploughed back into the state where huge amounts were dished out for development. Europe can’t now complain that the chickens have come home to roost. We are seeing the long term consequences of outsourcing being played out in every country of Western Europe. Hollowed out industrial heartlands. Generations of families with lack of opportunities. Poor health and education because governments failed to properly tax the corporations that benefited massively from outsourcing. The rise of the far right preying on these grievances.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      They don’t need clout, just a big market and they already have that.

      Look at India, they coerced many big tech companies and even Apple to open up manufacturing in their borders to avoid import tax.

  • BaraCoded@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    How stupid a neoliberal can be to advocate for globalisation for DECADES, draining the productive force of their own countries for social dumping and quick cash, then come fucking cry against China now that everything that could be foreseen HAPPENED? Industry transfers, technology transfers, they have EVERYTHING and it’s OUR LEADERS’ FAULT. How dare we whine about our own irresponsibility and short-sightedness?

    These buffons need to fucking go, they’re just too dumb for power.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Even on the little scale of the cities around mine, I remember clearly all the little industries and their miopic owners happily using chinese immigrants in whack-a-mole companies to do dirt cheap labor; and then, when said immigrants had learned the trade and slowly swallowed the market, whining and crying for “all these chinese stealing all the work”. That said I don’t oppose that paper, I just find it very ironic and hypocrite.