Wudi@feddit.uk to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 11 days agoGerman prosecutors charge two men with plotting to kill Jewish leaders for Iranwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down12
arrow-up131arrow-down1external-linkGerman prosecutors charge two men with plotting to kill Jewish leaders for Iranwww.reuters.comWudi@feddit.uk to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squarebirdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·11 days agoSo far we only hear statements from one side, the prosecutors. Where is the defendants’ side? This is terrible journalism.
minus-squareValuy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·edit-211 days agoThis is Iran we are talking about. I mean, look at who is the new head of their military https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_Vahidi
minus-squarePommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·11 days agoThe defendents’ identities weren’t made public, to preserve their privacy. It’s even in the article: “Reuters could not immediately contact lawyers for the suspects.” How do you expect Reuters to get their story at this time?
minus-squarebirdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·11 days agoNeither were the federal prosecutors’ identities. And yet we hear their side of the story. Imho Reuters shouldn’t have publicised this article at all.
minus-squareSuccessful_Try543@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 days agoReuters is a news agency, not a newspaper.
minus-squarebirdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·11 days agoSo? I think news agencies also should be held to like standards as that of newspapers of record.
So far we only hear statements from one side, the prosecutors. Where is the defendants’ side? This is terrible journalism.
This is Iran we are talking about.
I mean, look at who is the new head of their military
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_Vahidi
The defendents’ identities weren’t made public, to preserve their privacy.
It’s even in the article:
“Reuters could not immediately contact lawyers for the suspects.”
How do you expect Reuters to get their story at this time?
Neither were the federal prosecutors’ identities. And yet we hear their side of the story.
Imho Reuters shouldn’t have publicised this article at all.
Reuters is a news agency, not a newspaper.
So? I think news agencies also should be held to like standards as that of newspapers of record.