• General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Look… Doesn’t that feel kind of like self-pitying rot to anyone here? Why are we dependent on US technology? Because we are so ethical and pure…

    Here’s the truth.

    In the late 90s, a German student created a search engine in Germany. It was a little thing. It only scraped a few hundred media outlets. You signed up, defined some keywords, and when an article matching those keywords was published, you received a notification.

    He immediately was sued and forced to shut down under copyright law. Google could operate in the US under Fair Use.

    Eventually, years later search engines were legalized in Germany (and the EU). But by then the Internet was dominated by US companies. It makes no sense to spend billions to build a European Google that does exactly what Google already does.

    The reason that there is no European Google is that we insist that information must be owned. No data processing without the explicit consent of the owner. Which means, we insist that some intellectual property owners should be allowed to extract rent from us all.

  • saxrussell@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    There’s actually pretty many to choose from.

    Ones I’ve tried:

    others:

    Honestly, just switch your default search engine in your phone-settings and see what happens. After a while you don’t even realize you’re not using Google anymore. And if you’re not pleased with the search result (which I rarely am these days, using ecosia) see if Google gives a better answer. Mostly not. Happy experimenting! ;)

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Because, generally speaking, Europe has this thing called laws, and the government arguably exists to protect it’s “citizens”.

    In the US you have this thing called lobbyists and the government unilaterally exists, only to protect it’s “corporations”

    For example, in Europe McDonald’s French fries contain 3 ingredients (potato, salt, oil) and in the US there are around 20 ingredients… The US adds all that extra shit to make the frier oil last longer, to make it easier to clean, etc. and fuck you for being poor if it gives you cancer.

    Europe has better frameworks in place to prevent robber barons, this is just as true for the digital age as it was 200 years ago.

    • Exatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      For example, in Europe McDonald’s French fries contain 3 ingredients (potato, salt, oil) and in the US there are around 20 ingredients… The US adds all that extra shit to make the frier oil last longer, to make it easier to clean, etc. and fuck you for being poor if it gives you cancer.

      That’s actually a very poor example because the US and Europe have very different regulatory frameworks. The US actually requires more details when listing ingredients than Europea does.

      • FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        That’s actually a very poor example because the US and Europe have very different regulatory frameworks. The US actually requires more details when listing ingredients than Europea does.

        In the EU you must list all ingredients in your product. Ordered by what it has the most.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        There is a bigger picture here. Food in America is using ingredients that is not allowed in the EU because its seen as toxic. That is what the focus should stay on i think.

        • Exatron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          You do understand that the US bans ingredients that the EU allows for the same reason, right, sparky?

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Qwant (french) got its own indexing.

    Edit: the linked article isn’t about search engines but big tech companies.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Qwant is fricken awesome, it’s as good as and sometimes even better than Google

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          They’re both very similar.

          Both still use Google and Bing for part of their search results (albeit with the search queries somewhat anonymised). And both have been working together on a European search index which they have been slowly rolling out over the past year orso now.

          Ecosia differentiates itself from the competition by using part of their profits to plant trees, and by promising that their servers are run on renewable energy.

          Personally I use Ecosia over Qwant, because I found the search results for news articles to be a bit better. But ultimately both are very similar.