What started as a widely backed proposal to locate a new Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum on the National Mall devolved into a partisan fight Thursday after Republicans revised the legislation to ensure no transgender people are included in the exhibits.
The House rejected the bill, 204-216, an outcome that leaves the next steps uncertain. The revised bill also would ban a “diversity” of views and give President Donald Trump the final say on where the museum would be located.
“It was a simple bill. You kind of ruined it with your trans obsession and your culture wars,” Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez, a Democrat from New Mexico and chair of the Democratic Women’s Caucus, said earlier in the week.
But Republicans argued it was Democrats who were overreacting to the changes and now threatening progress toward establishing the long-sought women’s museum in the nation’s capital.
Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of New York, the bill’s chief sponsor, said “it’s a disgrace” that Democrats would be standing in the way of the bill’s passage.
“Perhaps the party that is opposing a women’s history museum on the National Mall because they want to have transgender exhibits — maybe they are the ones who are trans obsessed,” Malliotakis said.
In the final tally, a handful of Republicans voted against the bill, joining Democrats who led the opposition. The chamber came to a standstill as GOP leaders scrounged for support from their ranks.


Did you misread? It’s the Republican shit-gibboning yet again
It’s a poison pill. This is a common bad faith tactic in politics in general, to “make” the other side vote against something, and here it’s clearly being done by the Republicans.
They’re a propaganda chugging chode.
Read the article.
I did, republicans just had to attempt to add anti-trans legislation. It was going to pass before that. Did you want Dems to agree with anti-trans legislation for some reason?
Removed by mod
Spoken like a true transphobe. Eat shit, loser.
Removed by mod
You just said that the “12” trans people are “attention seeking”, and then in this very post are trying to claim that trans people have only been around since 2005. We’ve been around the entire time, we just get shit on by transphobic idiots like yourself and minimized by history.
Never had a bad word to say my ass, you’re pathetic.
Removed by mod
Just a guess: Are a lot of people in your life overly sensitive?
Hmm yes a “separate but equal” museum what a great non bigoted idea.
Removed by mod
This is a bad analogy, and it shows that you are either not paying attention to the facts or are a troll.
It would be closer to saying that, by a Republican amended law, Asians aren’t allowed in the new black history Museum.
Removed by mod
It would mean that anyone that is black and also has Asian heritage would not be allowed to be in the museum. So yeah, it would be a bad rule to add at the last second for no reason outside of bigotry.
You’re speaking to a trans person right now. Get bent.
Removed by mod
Except you also don’t care why things happened. Called it wrong. And then proudly stood behind bigotry. I bet you call it like you see it, huh.
Removed by mod